PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

✅+49.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $11,092 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 611.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 400W, a 280W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9575F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,643 vs 29,308).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅+49.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $11,092 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 611.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 400W, a 280W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9575F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,643 vs 29,308).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than EPYC 9575F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9575F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9575F is the better fit. You are getting 49.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $11,092 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $11,791 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9575F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 49.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 611.7% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9575F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 16/32. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	303 FPS	291 FPS
medium	280 FPS	265 FPS
high	232 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	275 FPS
medium	223 FPS	227 FPS
high	172 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	190 FPS
medium	154 FPS	156 FPS
high	118 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	107 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	797 FPS	734 FPS
medium	681 FPS	627 FPS
high	536 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	393 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	602 FPS
medium	585 FPS	536 FPS
high	475 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	326 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	338 FPS
medium	332 FPS	305 FPS
high	306 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	229 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	884 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	721 FPS	1122 FPS
high	652 FPS	1062 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	936 FPS
medium	560 FPS	845 FPS
high	494 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	574 FPS
medium	404 FPS	498 FPS
high	359 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	378 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	1118 FPS	1082 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	973 FPS
high	884 FPS	854 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	766 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	853 FPS
medium	778 FPS	751 FPS
high	683 FPS	659 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	569 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	623 FPS
medium	575 FPS	555 FPS
high	511 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	426 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9575F has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 13.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 3.3 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 81.3% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 19,643 (39.5% advantage for the EPYC 9575F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+300%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.7 GHz+14%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	4.2 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	147,718+137%	62,323
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	38,581
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,926
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308+49%	19,643

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9575F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the EPYC 9575F offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Socket	SP5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9575F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	true
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($11791 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $11092 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 150.7% better value option.