PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

✅+146.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌281% higher power demand at 400W vs 105W.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,242 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 466.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 400W, a 295W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,888 vs 29,308).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9575F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅+146.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,242 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 466.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 400W, a 295W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌281% higher power demand at 400W vs 105W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,888 vs 29,308).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9575F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than EPYC 9575F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9575F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9575F is the better fit. You are getting 146.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 5900X is $11,242 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $11,791 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9575F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 146.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 466.4% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9575F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	303 FPS	323 FPS
medium	280 FPS	291 FPS
high	232 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	193 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	307 FPS
medium	223 FPS	248 FPS
high	172 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	193 FPS
medium	154 FPS	156 FPS
high	118 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	103 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	797 FPS	772 FPS
medium	681 FPS	647 FPS
high	536 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	450 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	619 FPS
medium	585 FPS	536 FPS
high	475 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	365 FPS
medium	332 FPS	318 FPS
high	306 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	255 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	884 FPS	832 FPS
medium	721 FPS	645 FPS
high	652 FPS	558 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	459 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	721 FPS
medium	560 FPS	565 FPS
high	494 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	407 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	511 FPS
medium	404 FPS	421 FPS
high	359 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	308 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	1118 FPS	974 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	974 FPS
high	884 FPS	934 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	826 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	959 FPS
medium	778 FPS	843 FPS
high	683 FPS	726 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	617 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	694 FPS
medium	575 FPS	621 FPS
high	511 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen 9 5900X

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 9575F has 52 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 4.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9575F (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 116.5% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 11,888 (84.6% advantage for the EPYC 9575F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+433%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5 GHz+4%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.7 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+300%	64 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	147,718+279%	38,955
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308+147%	11,888

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9575F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the EPYC 9575F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9575F) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the EPYC 9575F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. On MSRP ($11791 vs $549), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $11242 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 140% better value option.