PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,492 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 610.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 29,308).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9575F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,492 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 610.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 29,308).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9575F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9575F better than Ryzen 7 5700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9575F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9575F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9575F is the better fit. You are getting 201.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9575F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9575F is 3843.5% more expensive on MSRP at $11,791 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5700X is also 610.4% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9575F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	303 FPS	156 FPS
medium	280 FPS	129 FPS
high	232 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	137 FPS
medium	223 FPS	111 FPS
high	172 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	77 FPS
medium	154 FPS	67 FPS
high	118 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	43 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 7 5700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	797 FPS	649 FPS
medium	681 FPS	549 FPS
high	536 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	404 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	552 FPS
medium	585 FPS	484 FPS
high	475 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	350 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	343 FPS
medium	332 FPS	303 FPS
high	306 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	245 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 7 5700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	884 FPS	665 FPS
medium	721 FPS	557 FPS
high	652 FPS	509 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	554 FPS
medium	560 FPS	458 FPS
high	494 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	358 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	402 FPS
medium	404 FPS	322 FPS
high	359 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	229 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 7 5700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 5700X
1080p
low	1118 FPS	665 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	665 FPS
high	884 FPS	665 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	665 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	665 FPS
medium	778 FPS	665 FPS
high	683 FPS	607 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	533 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	545 FPS
medium	575 FPS	488 FPS
high	511 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	385 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 7 5700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen 7 5700X

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9575F has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 8.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9575F (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 138.9% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 9,715 (100.4% advantage for the EPYC 9575F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+700%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+9%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	147,718+455%	26,609
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	14,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,116
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308+202%	9,715

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9575F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the EPYC 9575F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9575F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the EPYC 9575F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 5700X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 5700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($11791 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $11492 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 150.6% better value option.