PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌281% higher power demand at 400W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,492 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 656.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 400W, a 295W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9575F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 29,308).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,492 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 656.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 400W, a 295W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9575F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌281% higher power demand at 400W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 29,308).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9575F better than Ryzen 5 7600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9575F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9575F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9575F is the better fit. You are getting 112.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9575F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9575F is 3843.5% more expensive on MSRP at $11,791 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7600X is also 656.2% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9575F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 6/12. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	303 FPS	266 FPS
medium	280 FPS	246 FPS
high	232 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	226 FPS
medium	223 FPS	189 FPS
high	172 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	157 FPS
medium	154 FPS	131 FPS
high	118 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	87 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	797 FPS	649 FPS
medium	681 FPS	524 FPS
high	536 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	386 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	544 FPS
medium	585 FPS	455 FPS
high	475 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	341 FPS
medium	332 FPS	290 FPS
high	306 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	232 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	884 FPS	708 FPS
medium	721 FPS	652 FPS
high	652 FPS	571 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	484 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	708 FPS
medium	560 FPS	554 FPS
high	494 FPS	479 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	409 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	463 FPS
medium	404 FPS	392 FPS
high	359 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	281 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 5 7600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	1118 FPS	708 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	708 FPS
high	884 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	708 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	708 FPS
medium	778 FPS	708 FPS
high	683 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	571 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	560 FPS
medium	575 FPS	502 FPS
high	511 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	391 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen 5 7600X

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9575F has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 5.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 135.6% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 13,800 (71.9% advantage for the EPYC 9575F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 7600X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+967%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.3 GHz+6%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	4.7 GHz+42%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	6 MB+500%
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	147,718+422%	28,325
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	15,300
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308+112%	13,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9575F) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the EPYC 9575F offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 7600X
Socket	SP5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9575F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 7600X
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($11791 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $11492 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 153.3% better value option.