PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.0% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,592 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 609.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9575F.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 29,308).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9575F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.0% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $11,592 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 609.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 400W, a 335W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 9575F.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌515.4% higher power demand at 400W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9575F across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 29,308).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9575F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9575F better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9575F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9575F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 37.0% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9575F is the better fit. You are getting 1444.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9575F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9575F is 5825.1% more expensive on MSRP at $11,791 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 37.0% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 609.4% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9575F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	303 FPS	200 FPS
medium	280 FPS	161 FPS
high	232 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	154 FPS
medium	223 FPS	119 FPS
high	172 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	70 FPS
medium	154 FPS	58 FPS
high	118 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	36 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 5 3600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	797 FPS	442 FPS
medium	681 FPS	404 FPS
high	536 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	295 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	420 FPS
medium	585 FPS	359 FPS
high	475 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	263 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	297 FPS
medium	332 FPS	259 FPS
high	306 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	201 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 5 3600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	884 FPS	442 FPS
medium	721 FPS	442 FPS
high	652 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	442 FPS
medium	560 FPS	442 FPS
high	494 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	442 FPS
medium	404 FPS	361 FPS
high	359 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	242 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 5 3600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 3600
1080p
low	1118 FPS	442 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	442 FPS
high	884 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	442 FPS
medium	778 FPS	442 FPS
high	683 FPS	442 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	442 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	442 FPS
medium	575 FPS	442 FPS
high	511 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	357 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 5 3600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen 5 3600

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9575F has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 17.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 9575F (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 157.2% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 1,898 (175.7% advantage for the EPYC 9575F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+967%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5 GHz+19%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	147,718+735%	17,685
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308+1444%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9575F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the EPYC 9575F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9575F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the EPYC 9575F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	Yes
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	Gaming/Budget Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($11791 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $11592 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 150.6% better value option.