PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9135

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.6 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $915 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9135 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 57,808).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9135, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9135 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9135

2024

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $915 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.6 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9135 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 57,808).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9135, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9135 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9135 better than Ryzen 5 5600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9135 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9135 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9135 is the better fit. You are getting 164.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9135 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9135 is 306.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,214 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600X is also 53.4% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 47.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9135 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9135 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 5600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	172 FPS	203 FPS
medium	139 FPS	174 FPS
high	119 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	152 FPS	169 FPS
medium	120 FPS	141 FPS
high	99 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	85 FPS
medium	69 FPS	76 FPS
high	55 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	47 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	496 FPS	464 FPS
medium	439 FPS	387 FPS
high	341 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	293 FPS	291 FPS
1440p
low	427 FPS	397 FPS
medium	382 FPS	334 FPS
high	309 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	253 FPS
4K
low	267 FPS	263 FPS
medium	242 FPS	226 FPS
high	211 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	171 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	729 FPS	546 FPS
medium	607 FPS	473 FPS
high	552 FPS	432 FPS
ultra	489 FPS	358 FPS
1440p
low	559 FPS	508 FPS
medium	463 FPS	413 FPS
high	415 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	362 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	407 FPS	348 FPS
medium	325 FPS	292 FPS
high	287 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	199 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Ryzen 5 5600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 5600X
1080p
low	929 FPS	546 FPS
medium	846 FPS	546 FPS
high	732 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	660 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	735 FPS	546 FPS
medium	652 FPS	546 FPS
high	561 FPS	546 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	524 FPS
4K
low	524 FPS	529 FPS
medium	475 FPS	484 FPS
high	417 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	365 FPS	379 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Ryzen 5 5600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9135 and Ryzen 5 5600X

EPYC 9135

The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.

Ryzen 5 5600X

The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9135 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9135 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.65 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 9135 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9135 scores 57,808 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 90.3% lead for the EPYC 9135. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 5600X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.6 GHz+7%
Base Clock	3.65 GHz	3.7 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+100%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	57,808+165%	21,845

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9135 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9135 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the EPYC 9135 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9135) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9135) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the EPYC 9135 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9135) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).

Feature	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 5600X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6000+149900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144	128 GB+2184433%
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9135 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9135) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Ryzen 5 5600X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9135 launched at $1214 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($1214 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $915 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9135 delivers 47.6 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 42.2% better value option.