
EPYC 9135
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6421N
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9135
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,154 less on MSRP ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.6 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,808 vs 58,797).
Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 200W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
EPYC 9135
2024Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,154 less on MSRP ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.6 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 200W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,808 vs 58,797).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9135 better than Xeon Gold 6421N?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9135 | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9135 | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9135 | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 729 FPS | 956 FPS |
| medium | 607 FPS | 837 FPS |
| high | 552 FPS | 793 FPS |
| ultra | 489 FPS | 705 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9135 | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 923 FPS |
| medium | 846 FPS | 832 FPS |
| high | 732 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 660 FPS | 619 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 735 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9135 and Xeon Gold 6421N

EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135
The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.

Xeon Gold 6421N
Xeon Gold 6421N
The Xeon Gold 6421N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,797 points. Launch price was $2,368.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9135 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6421N offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6421N has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6421N — a 17.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9135 (base: 3.65 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The EPYC 9135 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6421N uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9135 scores 57,808 against the Xeon Gold 6421N's 58,797 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6421N. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135 vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6421N.
| Feature | EPYC 9135 | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+19% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.65 GHz+103% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+7% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 57,808 | 58,797+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9135 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6421N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9135 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6421N — the EPYC 9135 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9135) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6421N). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9135) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6421N) — the EPYC 9135 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9135) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6421N).
| Feature | EPYC 9135 | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+25% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P; Xeon Gold 6421N rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 9135 | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9135 launched at $1214 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6421N debuted at $2368. On MSRP ($1214 vs $2368), the EPYC 9135 is $1154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9135 delivers 47.6 pts/$ vs 24.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6421N — making the EPYC 9135 the 62.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9135 | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1214-49% | $2368 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.6+92% | 24.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













