
EPYC 8534P
Popular choices:

Xeon w7-3565X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8534P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 335W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3565X across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,882 vs 19,812).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 26.4 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $2,689 MSRP).
Xeon w7-3565X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.0% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,840 less on MSRP ($2,689 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($2,689 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌67.5% higher power demand at 335W vs 200W.
EPYC 8534P
2023Xeon w7-3565X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+55.2% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 83 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 335W, a 135W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.0% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,840 less on MSRP ($2,689 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($2,689 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3565X across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,882 vs 19,812).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 26.4 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $2,689 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌67.5% higher power demand at 335W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-3565X better than EPYC 8534P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8534P | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8534P | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 608 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 431 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 235 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8534P | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 860 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 786 FPS | 1086 FPS |
| high | 760 FPS | 1020 FPS |
| ultra | 682 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 1009 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 913 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 839 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 400 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8534P | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1022 FPS | 1171 FPS |
| medium | 912 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 771 FPS | 922 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 819 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 948 FPS |
| medium | 711 FPS | 829 FPS |
| high | 597 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 491 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 599 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 523 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8534P and Xeon w7-3565X

EPYC 8534P
EPYC 8534P
The EPYC 8534P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 71,900 points. Launch price was $4,950.

Xeon w7-3565X
Xeon w7-3565X
The Xeon w7-3565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 335 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 70,982 points. Launch price was $2,689.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8534P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon w7-3565X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8534P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8534P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3565X — a 43% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3565X (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 8534P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8534P scores 71,900 against the Xeon w7-3565X's 70,982 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 8534P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,678 vs 2,300, a 31.3% lead for the Xeon w7-3565X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,882 vs 19,812 (4.8% advantage for the Xeon w7-3565X). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8534P vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3565X.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+100% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+55% | 82.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 71,900+1% | 70,982 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,678 | 2,300+37% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,882 | 19,812+5% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8534P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon w7-3565X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1152 GB — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8534P) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3565X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8534P) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3565X) — the Xeon w7-3565X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8534P) and W790 (Xeon w7-3565X).
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 GB | 4096 GB+256% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 112+17% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 8534P) vs true (Xeon w7-3565X). Primary use case: EPYC 8534P targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 8534P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon w7-3565X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Cloud Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8534P launched at $5529 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3565X debuted at $2689. On MSRP ($5529 vs $2689), the Xeon w7-3565X is $2840 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8534P delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 26.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3565X — making the Xeon w7-3565X the 68% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8534P | Xeon w7-3565X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5529 | $2689-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.0 | 26.4+103% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













