PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8534P

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 200W instead of 320W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9274F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (71,900 vs 73,982).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).

EPYC 9274F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $2,469 less on MSRP ($3,060 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($3,060 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 320W vs 200W.

EPYC 8534P

2023

EPYC 9274F

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 200W instead of 320W, a 120W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Costs $2,469 less on MSRP ($3,060 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($3,060 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9274F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (71,900 vs 73,982).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 320W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9274F better than EPYC 8534P?

Yes. EPYC 9274F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 10.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.9% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9274F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9274F is the better fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9274F is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9274F is $2,469 cheaper on MSRP at $3,060 MSRP versus $5,529 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 85.9% better value on MSRP (24.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8534P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 8534P Benchmark Check

EPYC 9274F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 8534P	EPYC 9274F
1080p
low	159 FPS	218 FPS
medium	131 FPS	180 FPS
high	110 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	191 FPS
medium	114 FPS	152 FPS
high	90 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	88 FPS
medium	58 FPS	75 FPS
high	45 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	48 FPS

Open EPYC 8534P Open EPYC 9274F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 8534P	EPYC 9274F
1080p
low	415 FPS	637 FPS
medium	365 FPS	556 FPS
high	297 FPS	449 FPS
ultra	233 FPS	392 FPS
1440p
low	341 FPS	538 FPS
medium	308 FPS	478 FPS
high	258 FPS	397 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	327 FPS
4K
low	210 FPS	334 FPS
medium	193 FPS	300 FPS
high	162 FPS	269 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	240 FPS

Open EPYC 8534P Open EPYC 9274F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 8534P	EPYC 9274F
1080p
low	860 FPS	817 FPS
medium	786 FPS	690 FPS
high	760 FPS	624 FPS
ultra	682 FPS	545 FPS
1440p
low	663 FPS	616 FPS
medium	587 FPS	518 FPS
high	558 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	498 FPS	395 FPS
4K
low	435 FPS	441 FPS
medium	344 FPS	352 FPS
high	307 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	250 FPS	247 FPS

Open EPYC 8534P Open EPYC 9274F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 8534P	EPYC 9274F
1080p
low	1022 FPS	1138 FPS
medium	912 FPS	1015 FPS
high	771 FPS	875 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	784 FPS
1440p
low	832 FPS	881 FPS
medium	711 FPS	775 FPS
high	597 FPS	655 FPS
ultra	491 FPS	571 FPS
4K
low	599 FPS	624 FPS
medium	523 FPS	564 FPS
high	451 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	426 FPS

Open EPYC 8534P Open EPYC 9274F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8534P and EPYC 9274F

EPYC 8534P

The EPYC 8534P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 71,900 points. Launch price was $4,950.

EPYC 9274F

The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8534P packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the EPYC 9274F offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 8534P has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8534P versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F — a 32.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 9274F (base: 2.3 GHz vs 4.05 GHz). The EPYC 8534P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9274F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8534P scores 71,900 against the EPYC 9274F's 73,982 — a 2.9% lead for the EPYC 9274F. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8534P vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9274F.

Feature	EPYC 8534P	EPYC 9274F
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+167%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4.3 GHz+39%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	4.05 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	71,900	73,982+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,678	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,882	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8534P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9274F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 8534P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9274F — the EPYC 9274F supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9274F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1152 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8534P) vs 12 (EPYC 9274F). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8534P) vs 128 (EPYC 9274F) — the EPYC 9274F offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8534P) and SP5 (EPYC 9274F).

Feature	EPYC 8534P	EPYC 9274F
Socket	SP6	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity	1152 GB+19660700%	6144
RAM Channels	6	12+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	128+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 8534P) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9274F). Primary use case: EPYC 8534P targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 8534P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 8534P	EPYC 9274F
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP
Target Use	Cloud Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 8534P launched at $5529 MSRP, while the EPYC 9274F debuted at $3060. On MSRP ($5529 vs $3060), the EPYC 9274F is $2469 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8534P delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 24.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 9274F — making the EPYC 9274F the 60.1% better value option.