
EPYC 8434P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8434P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅242.9% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.7% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,068 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 8434P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 66,490).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8434P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 8434P
2023Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅242.9% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.7% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,068 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 8434P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 66,490).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8434P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 8434P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 273 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 860 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 786 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 760 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 682 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1023 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 913 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 772 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 833 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8434P and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 8434P
EPYC 8434P
The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8434P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 46.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 8434P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8434P scores 66,490 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 63.9% lead for the EPYC 8434P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+500% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 5 GHz+61% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz+76% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+33% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 66,490+94% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8434P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8434P versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the EPYC 8434P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8434P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 160% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8434P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8434P) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 8434P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8434P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 128 GB+11650744% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+243% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8434P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 8434P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8434P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($1517 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $1068 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8434P delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 54.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8434P | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1517 | $449-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.8 | 76.4+74% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












