PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8434P

2023

Why buy it

✅+196.4% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,188 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 66,490).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8434P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8434P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8434P

2023

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅+196.4% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,188 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 66,490).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8434P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8434P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 8434P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 8434P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8434P is the better fit. You are getting 196.4% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $1,188 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,517 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 8434P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 196.4% better PassMark. It is also 55.5% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 43.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8434P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 8434P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	159 FPS	200 FPS
medium	131 FPS	163 FPS
high	110 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	156 FPS
medium	114 FPS	121 FPS
high	90 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	84 FPS
medium	58 FPS	71 FPS
high	45 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	44 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	419 FPS	561 FPS
medium	369 FPS	525 FPS
high	300 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	236 FPS	383 FPS
1440p
low	344 FPS	545 FPS
medium	311 FPS	471 FPS
high	260 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	212 FPS	350 FPS
medium	195 FPS	304 FPS
high	163 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	242 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	860 FPS	561 FPS
medium	786 FPS	561 FPS
high	760 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	682 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	663 FPS	561 FPS
medium	587 FPS	561 FPS
high	558 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	498 FPS	470 FPS
4K
low	435 FPS	499 FPS
medium	344 FPS	394 FPS
high	307 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	250 FPS	275 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Ryzen 7 3700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	1023 FPS	561 FPS
medium	913 FPS	561 FPS
high	772 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	833 FPS	561 FPS
medium	712 FPS	561 FPS
high	598 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	555 FPS
4K
low	600 FPS	561 FPS
medium	524 FPS	501 FPS
high	451 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	396 FPS

Open EPYC 8434P Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8434P and Ryzen 7 3700X

EPYC 8434P

The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8434P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 34.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8434P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8434P scores 66,490 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 99.1% lead for the EPYC 8434P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+500%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4.4 GHz+42%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+300%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	66,490+196%	22,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8434P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8434P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 8434P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8434P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 160% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8434P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8434P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 8434P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8434P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	SP6	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+119900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	1152	128 GB+11650744%
RAM Channels	6+200%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+300%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8434P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	EPYC 8434P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 8434P launched at $1517 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($1517 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1188 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8434P delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 43.5% better value option.