
EPYC 8124P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8124P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (36,079 vs 38,955).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
EPYC 8124P
2023Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (36,079 vs 38,955).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than EPYC 8124P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 767 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 743 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 667 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 974 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 974 FPS |
| high | 769 FPS | 934 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 823 FPS | 959 FPS |
| medium | 707 FPS | 843 FPS |
| high | 596 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 596 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 9 5900X

EPYC 8124P
EPYC 8124P
The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8124P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 8124P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2.45 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 7.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+60% |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz | 3.7 GHz+51% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 36,079 | 38,955+8% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the EPYC 8124P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8124P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the EPYC 8124P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8124P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8124P launched at $639 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. On MSRP ($639 vs $549), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 22.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $639 | $549-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5 | 71.0+26% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












