
EPYC 8124P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8124P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+35.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 57.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 36,079).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
EPYC 8124P
2023Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+35.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 57.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 36,079).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than EPYC 8124P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 767 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 743 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 667 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 769 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 823 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 707 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 596 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 596 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 7 5700X

EPYC 8124P
EPYC 8124P
The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8124P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8124P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2.45 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 30.2% lead for the EPYC 8124P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz | 3.4 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 36,079+36% | 26,609 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the EPYC 8124P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8124P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the EPYC 8124P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8124P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8124P launched at $639 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($639 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $340 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 44.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $639 | $299-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5 | 89.0+58% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












