PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

✅+60.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $310 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 36,079).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅+60.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $310 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 36,079).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 8124P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 8124P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8124P is the better fit. You are getting 60.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $310 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $639 MSRP, and it gives you 46.7% higher max boost clock. The trade-off is that EPYC 8124P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 60.9% better PassMark. It is also 20.7% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8124P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 8124P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 8124P	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	153 FPS	200 FPS
medium	125 FPS	163 FPS
high	105 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	139 FPS	156 FPS
medium	111 FPS	121 FPS
high	87 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	84 FPS
medium	57 FPS	71 FPS
high	44 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	44 FPS

Open EPYC 8124P Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 8124P	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	387 FPS	561 FPS
medium	344 FPS	525 FPS
high	281 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	383 FPS
1440p
low	327 FPS	545 FPS
medium	296 FPS	471 FPS
high	250 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	191 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	202 FPS	350 FPS
medium	186 FPS	304 FPS
high	157 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	127 FPS	242 FPS

Open EPYC 8124P Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 8124P	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	856 FPS	561 FPS
medium	767 FPS	561 FPS
high	743 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	667 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	561 FPS
medium	573 FPS	561 FPS
high	546 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	487 FPS	470 FPS
4K
low	432 FPS	499 FPS
medium	341 FPS	394 FPS
high	305 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	250 FPS	275 FPS

Open EPYC 8124P Open Ryzen 7 3700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 8124P	Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low	902 FPS	561 FPS
medium	902 FPS	561 FPS
high	769 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	647 FPS	561 FPS
1440p
low	823 FPS	561 FPS
medium	707 FPS	561 FPS
high	596 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	555 FPS
4K
low	596 FPS	561 FPS
medium	521 FPS	501 FPS
high	449 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	372 FPS	396 FPS

Open EPYC 8124P Open Ryzen 7 3700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 7 3700X

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8124P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8124P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.45 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 46.7% lead for the EPYC 8124P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.4 GHz+47%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz	3.6 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+100%	32 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm-29%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	36,079+61%	22,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 8124P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8124P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 8124P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	SP6	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+119900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	2048	128 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels	6+200%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+300%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 8124P launched at $639 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($639 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $310 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 18.8% better value option.