
EPYC 8124P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8124P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 8124P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8124P across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 36,079).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
EPYC 8124P
2023Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike EPYC 8124P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8124P across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 36,079).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 8124P better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 767 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 743 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 667 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 197 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 769 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 823 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 707 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 596 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 596 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 5 5600

EPYC 8124P
EPYC 8124P
The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8124P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 8124P has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 2.45 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 50.4% lead for the EPYC 8124P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+47% |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz | 3.5 GHz+43% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 36,079+67% | 21,550 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the EPYC 8124P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8124P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the EPYC 8124P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8124P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8124P launched at $639 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 5600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($639 vs $199), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $440 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 62.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $639 | $199-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5 | 108.3+92% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












