EPYC 7702 vs Xeon w7-3565X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7702

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon w7-3565X

32 Cores64 Thrd335 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 7702

64 / 128

69,060

0.0%

Ryzen 9 3950X

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-3565X

32 / 64

70,982

+2.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7702

2019

Why buy it

✅+210.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 83 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 335W, a 135W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3565X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (69,060 vs 70,982).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 26.4 PassMark/$ ($6,450 MSRP vs $2,689 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3565X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-3565X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +81.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,761 less on MSRP ($2,689 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 146.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($2,689 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 256 MB).
❌67.5% higher power demand at 335W vs 200W.

EPYC 7702

2019

Xeon w7-3565X

2024

Why buy it

✅+210.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 83 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 335W, a 135W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +81.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,761 less on MSRP ($2,689 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 146.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($2,689 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3565X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (69,060 vs 70,982).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 26.4 PassMark/$ ($6,450 MSRP vs $2,689 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3565X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (83 MB vs 256 MB).
❌67.5% higher power demand at 335W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3565X better than EPYC 7702?

Yes. Xeon w7-3565X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 81.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-3565X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 81.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3565X is the better fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3565X is the smarter buy today. Xeon w7-3565X is $3,761 cheaper on MSRP at $2,689 MSRP versus $6,450 MSRP, and it gives you a 81.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 146.5% better value on MSRP (26.4 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3565X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7702 Benchmark Check

Xeon w7-3565X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7702	Xeon w7-3565X
1080p
low	192 FPS	316 FPS
medium	172 FPS	306 FPS
high	138 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	207 FPS
1440p
low	157 FPS	274 FPS
medium	132 FPS	237 FPS
high	101 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	186 FPS
medium	65 FPS	159 FPS
high	50 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	108 FPS

Open EPYC 7702 Open Xeon w7-3565X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7702	Xeon w7-3565X
1080p
low	247 FPS	703 FPS
medium	221 FPS	608 FPS
high	183 FPS	492 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	431 FPS
1440p
low	202 FPS	563 FPS
medium	186 FPS	499 FPS
high	158 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	344 FPS
4K
low	126 FPS	330 FPS
medium	118 FPS	293 FPS
high	103 FPS	269 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	235 FPS

Open EPYC 7702 Open Xeon w7-3565X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7702	Xeon w7-3565X
1080p
low	629 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	536 FPS	1086 FPS
high	486 FPS	1020 FPS
ultra	415 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	524 FPS	1009 FPS
medium	446 FPS	913 FPS
high	394 FPS	839 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	389 FPS	605 FPS
medium	312 FPS	521 FPS
high	274 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	400 FPS

Open EPYC 7702 Open Xeon w7-3565X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7702	Xeon w7-3565X
1080p
low	904 FPS	1171 FPS
medium	823 FPS	1015 FPS
high	706 FPS	922 FPS
ultra	610 FPS	819 FPS
1440p
low	711 FPS	948 FPS
medium	620 FPS	829 FPS
high	530 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	642 FPS
4K
low	503 FPS	693 FPS
medium	452 FPS	618 FPS
high	398 FPS	556 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 7702 Open Xeon w7-3565X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7702 and Xeon w7-3565X

EPYC 7702

The EPYC 7702 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,060 points. Launch price was $6,450.

Xeon w7-3565X

The Xeon w7-3565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 335 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 70,982 points. Launch price was $2,689.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7702 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon w7-3565X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7702 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3565X — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3565X (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7702 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7702 scores 69,060 against the Xeon w7-3565X's 70,982 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon w7-3565X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702 vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3565X.

Feature	EPYC 7702	Xeon w7-3565X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	4.8 GHz+43%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+210%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	69,060	70,982+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,812

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7702 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7702 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3565X — the EPYC 7702 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7702) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3565X) — the EPYC 7702 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702) and W790 (Xeon w7-3565X).

Feature	EPYC 7702	Xeon w7-3565X
Socket	TR4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200+63900%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-3565X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702) vs true (Xeon w7-3565X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7702 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon w7-3565X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	EPYC 7702	Xeon w7-3565X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7702 launched at $6450 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3565X debuted at $2689. On MSRP ($6450 vs $2689), the Xeon w7-3565X is $3761 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 26.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3565X — making the Xeon w7-3565X the 84.6% better value option.