EPYC 7702 vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7702

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 Cores64 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 7702

64 / 128

69,060

+0.6%

Ryzen 9 3950X

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

32 / 64

68,643

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7702

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 48 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 205W, a 5W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8352Y across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($6,450 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,455 less on MSRP ($3,995 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 60.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (68,643 vs 69,060).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 256 MB).

EPYC 7702

2019

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 48 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 205W, a 5W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,455 less on MSRP ($3,995 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 60.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($3,995 MSRP vs $6,450 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8352Y across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($6,450 MSRP vs $3,995 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (68,643 vs 69,060).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8352Y better than EPYC 7702?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8352Y is ahead with a 23.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. EPYC 7702 also has the bigger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702 is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8352Y is the smarter buy today. Xeon Platinum 8352Y is $2,455 cheaper on MSRP at $3,995 MSRP versus $6,450 MSRP, and it gives you a 23.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7702 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 60.5% better value on MSRP (17.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8352Y is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7702 Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8352Y Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7702	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	192 FPS	189 FPS
medium	172 FPS	152 FPS
high	138 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	157 FPS	154 FPS
medium	132 FPS	120 FPS
high	101 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	72 FPS
medium	65 FPS	60 FPS
high	50 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	38 FPS

Open EPYC 7702 Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7702	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	247 FPS	233 FPS
medium	221 FPS	208 FPS
high	183 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	202 FPS	199 FPS
medium	186 FPS	181 FPS
high	158 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	126 FPS	124 FPS
medium	118 FPS	115 FPS
high	103 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	82 FPS

Open EPYC 7702 Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7702	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	629 FPS	969 FPS
medium	536 FPS	848 FPS
high	486 FPS	802 FPS
ultra	415 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	524 FPS	775 FPS
medium	446 FPS	669 FPS
high	394 FPS	632 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	561 FPS
4K
low	389 FPS	498 FPS
medium	312 FPS	393 FPS
high	274 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	224 FPS	285 FPS

Open EPYC 7702 Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7702	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
1080p
low	904 FPS	893 FPS
medium	823 FPS	811 FPS
high	706 FPS	697 FPS
ultra	610 FPS	599 FPS
1440p
low	711 FPS	699 FPS
medium	620 FPS	613 FPS
high	530 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	449 FPS
4K
low	503 FPS	504 FPS
medium	452 FPS	451 FPS
high	398 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	343 FPS

Open EPYC 7702 Open Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y

EPYC 7702

The EPYC 7702 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,060 points. Launch price was $6,450.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 68,643 points. Launch price was $3,995.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7702 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7702 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — a 1.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7702 is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7702 scores 69,060 against the Xeon Platinum 8352Y's 68,643 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 7702. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702 vs 48 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

Feature	EPYC 7702	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+100%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	3.4 GHz+1%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+433%	48 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	—
PassMark	69,060	68,643

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7702 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7702) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352Y) — the EPYC 7702 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7702) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352Y).

Feature	EPYC 7702	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Socket	TR4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8352Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7702 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Platinum 8352Y rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7702	Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7702 launched at $6450 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8352Y debuted at $3995. On MSRP ($6450 vs $3995), the Xeon Platinum 8352Y is $2455 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7702 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352Y — making the Xeon Platinum 8352Y the 46.4% better value option.