
EPYC 7601
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7601
2017Why buy it
- ✅+23.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 7601 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 35,059).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7601
2017Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+23.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 7601 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 35,059).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than EPYC 7601?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 834 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 759 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 708 FPS |
| ultra | 565 FPS | 708 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 667 FPS | 708 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 708 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 5 7600X

EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 49.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 21.2% lead for the EPYC 7601. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+433% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 5.3 GHz+66% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+114% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 6 MB+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 35,059+24% | 28,325 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,800 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X — the EPYC 7601 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7601 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7601) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the EPYC 7601 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7601) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666+53220% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7601) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 7601 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | EPYC 7601 | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












