EPYC 7552 vs Xeon Gold 6423N

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7552

48 Cores96 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Gold 6423N

28 Cores56 Thrd195 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 7552

48 / 96

57,414

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Gold 6423N

28 / 56

57,434

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7552

2019

Why buy it

✅+265.7% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 53 MB).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6423N across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,414 vs 57,434).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $2,161 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6423N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 6423N

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,864 less on MSRP ($2,161 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Delivers 86.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($2,161 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Draws 195W instead of 200W, a 5W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 192 MB).

EPYC 7552

2019

Xeon Gold 6423N

2023

Why buy it

✅+265.7% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 53 MB).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,864 less on MSRP ($2,161 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Delivers 86.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($2,161 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Draws 195W instead of 200W, a 5W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6423N across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,414 vs 57,434).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $2,161 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6423N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 192 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6423N better than EPYC 7552?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6423N is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6423N is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6423N is the better fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6423N is the smarter buy today. Xeon Gold 6423N is $1,864 cheaper on MSRP at $2,161 MSRP versus $4,025 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 86.3% better value on MSRP (26.6 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6423N is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 48/96, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7552 Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6423N Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7552	Xeon Gold 6423N
1080p
low	181 FPS	194 FPS
medium	158 FPS	157 FPS
high	123 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	152 FPS	157 FPS
medium	128 FPS	123 FPS
high	96 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	72 FPS
medium	63 FPS	60 FPS
high	48 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	38 FPS

Open EPYC 7552 Open Xeon Gold 6423N

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7552	Xeon Gold 6423N
1080p
low	236 FPS	237 FPS
medium	211 FPS	211 FPS
high	175 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	142 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	199 FPS
medium	177 FPS	181 FPS
high	152 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	120 FPS	124 FPS
medium	112 FPS	115 FPS
high	98 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	82 FPS

Open EPYC 7552 Open Xeon Gold 6423N

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7552	Xeon Gold 6423N
1080p
low	587 FPS	945 FPS
medium	492 FPS	827 FPS
high	437 FPS	782 FPS
ultra	365 FPS	693 FPS
1440p
low	492 FPS	748 FPS
medium	419 FPS	645 FPS
high	374 FPS	610 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	541 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	480 FPS
medium	298 FPS	379 FPS
high	265 FPS	337 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	275 FPS

Open EPYC 7552 Open Xeon Gold 6423N

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7552	Xeon Gold 6423N
1080p
low	890 FPS	924 FPS
medium	809 FPS	835 FPS
high	694 FPS	719 FPS
ultra	601 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	705 FPS	713 FPS
medium	615 FPS	628 FPS
high	525 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	446 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	515 FPS
medium	448 FPS	461 FPS
high	394 FPS	404 FPS
ultra	340 FPS	349 FPS

Open EPYC 7552 Open Xeon Gold 6423N

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6423N

EPYC 7552

The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

Xeon Gold 6423N

The Xeon Gold 6423N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2023-07-01. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 195 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,434 points. Launch price was $2,161.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6423N offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6423N — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6423N (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7552 is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the Xeon Gold 6423N's 57,434 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Gold 6423N. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6423N.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon Gold 6423N
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+71%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	192 MB (total)+266%	52.5 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	—
PassMark	57,414	57,434

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6423N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7552 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6423N — the Xeon Gold 6423N supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7552) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6423N) — the EPYC 7552 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6423N).

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon Gold 6423N
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6423N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon Gold 6423N rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon Gold 6423N
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7552 launched at $4025 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6423N debuted at $2161. On MSRP ($4025 vs $2161), the Xeon Gold 6423N is $1864 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 26.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6423N — making the Xeon Gold 6423N the 60.3% better value option.