
EPYC 7552
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6414U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7552
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+220% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6414U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 24.9 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $2,296 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6414U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6414U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,729 less on MSRP ($2,296 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($2,296 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,200 vs 57,414).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 192 MB).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
EPYC 7552
2019Xeon Gold 6414U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+220% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,729 less on MSRP ($2,296 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($2,296 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6414U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 24.9 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $2,296 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6414U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,200 vs 57,414).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 192 MB).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6414U better than EPYC 7552?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6414U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6414U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6414U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 804 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 715 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 682 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 717 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 592 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 532 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 393 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 291 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6414U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 890 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 809 FPS | 866 FPS |
| high | 694 FPS | 746 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 622 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 705 FPS | 802 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 525 FPS | 589 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 490 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6414U

EPYC 7552
EPYC 7552
The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

Xeon Gold 6414U
Xeon Gold 6414U
The Xeon Gold 6414U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,200 points. Launch price was $2,296.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6414U offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6414U — a 3% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6414U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7552 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6414U uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the Xeon Gold 6414U's 57,200 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7552. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6414U.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6414U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+50% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 192 MB (total)+220% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 57,414 | 57,200 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6414U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7552 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6414U — the Xeon Gold 6414U supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7552) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6414U) — the EPYC 7552 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6414U).
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6414U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6414U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon Gold 6414U rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6414U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7552 launched at $4025 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6414U debuted at $2296. On MSRP ($4025 vs $2296), the Xeon Gold 6414U is $1729 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 24.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6414U — making the Xeon Gold 6414U the 54.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6414U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4025 | $2296-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 24.9+74% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













