Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 7 165H

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 7 165H.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 165H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 25,849).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core Ultra 7 165H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +30.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 165H better than Core i5-13400F?
Yes. Core Ultra 7 165H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 30.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 165H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 30.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 165H is the better fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 22 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 165H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 7 165H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 30.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 165H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 22 threads instead of 10/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 165H
1080p
low171 FPS308 FPS
medium158 FPS278 FPS
high132 FPS232 FPS
ultra112 FPS198 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS251 FPS
medium123 FPS201 FPS
high99 FPS163 FPS
ultra84 FPS143 FPS
4K
low81 FPS173 FPS
medium74 FPS139 FPS
high59 FPS107 FPS
ultra46 FPS93 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 165H
1080p
low545 FPS646 FPS
medium464 FPS585 FPS
high389 FPS478 FPS
ultra356 FPS430 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS632 FPS
medium403 FPS530 FPS
high345 FPS437 FPS
ultra301 FPS371 FPS
4K
low280 FPS375 FPS
medium247 FPS320 FPS
high231 FPS295 FPS
ultra204 FPS258 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 165H
1080p
low530 FPS646 FPS
medium449 FPS646 FPS
high415 FPS646 FPS
ultra375 FPS646 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS646 FPS
medium422 FPS646 FPS
high382 FPS631 FPS
ultra343 FPS543 FPS
4K
low393 FPS641 FPS
medium331 FPS531 FPS
high296 FPS475 FPS
ultra246 FPS402 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 165H
1080p
low626 FPS646 FPS
medium626 FPS646 FPS
high626 FPS646 FPS
ultra626 FPS646 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS646 FPS
medium626 FPS646 FPS
high598 FPS646 FPS
ultra521 FPS579 FPS
4K
low535 FPS606 FPS
medium492 FPS538 FPS
high439 FPS486 FPS
ultra382 FPS423 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core Ultra 7 165H

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 165H

The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 165H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 165H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 7 165H's 25,849 — a 3.2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 165H. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 165H
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
16 / 22+60%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.8 GHz+52%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+60%
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
25,029
25,849+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 165H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 165H
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 165H). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 7 165H
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming