
Core Ultra 7 155U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4650 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,185 vs 16,225).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Xeon E5-4650 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155U across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023Xeon E5-4650 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,185 vs 16,225).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155U across 10 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-4650 v4 better than Core Ultra 7 155U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155U and Xeon E5-4650 v4

Core Ultra 7 155U
Core Ultra 7 155U
The Core Ultra 7 155U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,185 points. Launch price was $490.

Xeon E5-4650 v4
Xeon E5-4650 v4
The Xeon E5-4650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $3,838.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 155U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155U versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v4 — a 52.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155U scores 16,185 against the Xeon E5-4650 v4's 16,225 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-4650 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155U vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-4650 v4.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14 | 14 / 28+17% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+71% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 35 MB+192% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3.5 MB+75% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-P (2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 16,185 | 16,225 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












