
Core Ultra 7 155U
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2733NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,185 vs 16,206).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2733NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon D-2733NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155U across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023Xeon D-2733NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,185 vs 16,206).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2733NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155U across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon D-2733NT better than Core Ultra 7 155U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 312 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155U and Xeon D-2733NT

Core Ultra 7 155U
Core Ultra 7 155U
The Core Ultra 7 155U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,185 points. Launch price was $490.

Xeon D-2733NT
Xeon D-2733NT
The Xeon D-2733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,206 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 155U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon D-2733NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155U versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-2733NT — a 40% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155U scores 16,185 against the Xeon D-2733NT's 16,206 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon D-2733NT. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155U vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2733NT.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+50% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-P (2023) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 16,185 | 16,206 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












