
Core Ultra 7 155U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2669 V3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2669 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon E5-2669 V3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155U across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,107 vs 16,185).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023Xeon E5-2669 V3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2669 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155U across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,107 vs 16,185).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 155U better than Xeon E5-2669 V3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-2669 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-2669 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-2669 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 232 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-2669 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 327 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155U and Xeon E5-2669 V3

Core Ultra 7 155U
Core Ultra 7 155U
The Core Ultra 7 155U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,185 points. Launch price was $490.

Xeon E5-2669 V3
Xeon E5-2669 V3
The Xeon E5-2669 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,107 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 155U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2669 V3's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155U versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2669 V3 — a 43% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2669 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155U scores 16,185 against the Xeon E5-2669 V3's 16,107 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 155U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155U vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2669 V3.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-2669 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+55% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.3 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-P (2023) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 16,185 | 16,107 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2669 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155U | Xeon E5-2669 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












