Core Ultra 7 155U vs Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 155U

2023

Why buy it

  • Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (16,185 vs 17,685).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 7 155U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 155U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Core Ultra 7 155U?
Yes. Ryzen 5 3600 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.3% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data and 9.3% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.3% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better fit. You are getting 9.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 3600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 155U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 155URyzen 5 3600
1080p
low276 FPS200 FPS
medium248 FPS161 FPS
high209 FPS135 FPS
ultra180 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS154 FPS
medium185 FPS119 FPS
high152 FPS96 FPS
ultra133 FPS75 FPS
4K
low160 FPS70 FPS
medium130 FPS58 FPS
high100 FPS46 FPS
ultra88 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 155URyzen 5 3600
1080p
low214 FPS442 FPS
medium176 FPS404 FPS
high159 FPS332 FPS
ultra140 FPS295 FPS
1440p
low181 FPS420 FPS
medium155 FPS359 FPS
high143 FPS303 FPS
ultra122 FPS263 FPS
4K
low141 FPS297 FPS
medium124 FPS259 FPS
high118 FPS230 FPS
ultra101 FPS201 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 7 155URyzen 5 3600
1080p
low405 FPS442 FPS
medium405 FPS442 FPS
high405 FPS442 FPS
ultra405 FPS442 FPS
1440p
low405 FPS442 FPS
medium405 FPS442 FPS
high405 FPS442 FPS
ultra405 FPS432 FPS
4K
low405 FPS442 FPS
medium405 FPS361 FPS
high405 FPS305 FPS
ultra342 FPS242 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 7 155URyzen 5 3600
1080p
low405 FPS442 FPS
medium405 FPS442 FPS
high405 FPS442 FPS
ultra405 FPS442 FPS
1440p
low405 FPS442 FPS
medium405 FPS442 FPS
high405 FPS442 FPS
ultra405 FPS442 FPS
4K
low405 FPS442 FPS
medium405 FPS442 FPS
high405 FPS413 FPS
ultra403 FPS357 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155U and Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155U

The Core Ultra 7 155U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,185 points. Launch price was $490.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 155U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155U versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155U scores 16,185 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 8.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155U vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155URyzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
12 / 14+100%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+14%
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz+112%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
16,185
17,685+9%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 155U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155URyzen 5 3600
Socket
FCBGA2049
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 7 155U) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155URyzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation