Core i5-13400F vs Core Ultra 5 236V

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 236V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2024

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 236V.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 236V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.

Core Ultra 5 236V

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (18,313 vs 25,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core Ultra 5 236V?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 28.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data and 36.7% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 28.6% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 36.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 28.6% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 236V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 236V
1080p
low171 FPS180 FPS
medium158 FPS147 FPS
high132 FPS120 FPS
ultra112 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS148 FPS
medium123 FPS118 FPS
high99 FPS96 FPS
ultra84 FPS79 FPS
4K
low81 FPS83 FPS
medium74 FPS71 FPS
high59 FPS57 FPS
ultra46 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 236V
1080p
low545 FPS212 FPS
medium464 FPS176 FPS
high389 FPS158 FPS
ultra356 FPS139 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS181 FPS
medium403 FPS154 FPS
high345 FPS142 FPS
ultra301 FPS122 FPS
4K
low280 FPS137 FPS
medium247 FPS122 FPS
high231 FPS115 FPS
ultra204 FPS100 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 236V
1080p
low530 FPS458 FPS
medium449 FPS458 FPS
high415 FPS458 FPS
ultra375 FPS458 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS458 FPS
medium422 FPS458 FPS
high382 FPS458 FPS
ultra343 FPS458 FPS
4K
low393 FPS458 FPS
medium331 FPS458 FPS
high296 FPS404 FPS
ultra246 FPS336 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 236V
1080p
low626 FPS458 FPS
medium626 FPS458 FPS
high626 FPS458 FPS
ultra626 FPS458 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS458 FPS
medium626 FPS458 FPS
high598 FPS458 FPS
ultra521 FPS458 FPS
4K
low535 FPS458 FPS
medium492 FPS458 FPS
high439 FPS458 FPS
ultra382 FPS418 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core Ultra 5 236V

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 236V

The Core Ultra 5 236V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,313 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 236V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 236V — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 236V (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 236V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 5 236V's 18,313 — a 31% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 236V.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 236V
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+25%
8 / 8
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.7 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+19%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+150%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+100%
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
25,029+37%
18,313
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 236V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 236V
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 236V). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 236V
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 236V debuted at $0. On MSRP ($196 vs $0), the Core Ultra 5 236V is $196 cheaper.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore Ultra 5 236V
MSRP
$196
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
127.7
Release Date
2023
2024