PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌364.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 14W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 5 225U

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 14W instead of 65W, a 51W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,846 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core Ultra 5 225U

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225U.

Why buy it

✅Draws 14W instead of 65W, a 51W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌364.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 14W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,846 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core Ultra 5 225U?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 45.4% better Geekbench multi-core, and 35.8% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 45.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 5 225U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225U
1080p
low	171 FPS	277 FPS
medium	158 FPS	248 FPS
high	132 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	181 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	230 FPS
medium	123 FPS	185 FPS
high	99 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	161 FPS
medium	74 FPS	131 FPS
high	59 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	89 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 225U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225U
1080p
low	545 FPS	420 FPS
medium	464 FPS	335 FPS
high	389 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	358 FPS
medium	403 FPS	296 FPS
high	345 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	227 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	278 FPS
medium	247 FPS	237 FPS
high	231 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	188 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 225U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225U
1080p
low	530 FPS	461 FPS
medium	449 FPS	461 FPS
high	415 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	461 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	461 FPS
medium	422 FPS	461 FPS
high	382 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	461 FPS
medium	331 FPS	461 FPS
high	296 FPS	409 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	342 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 225U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225U
1080p
low	626 FPS	461 FPS
medium	626 FPS	461 FPS
high	626 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	461 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	461 FPS
medium	626 FPS	461 FPS
high	598 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	461 FPS
medium	492 FPS	461 FPS
high	439 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	410 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 225U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core Ultra 5 225U

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core Ultra 5 225U

The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225U uses Arrow Lake-U (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 5 225U's 18,434 — a 30.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,374, a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 7,846 (37% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225U
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 14+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+67%	12 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Arrow Lake-U (2025)
PassMark	25,029+36%	18,434
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+1%	2,374
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+45%	7,846

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Meteor Lake SoC (Core Ultra 5 225U).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225U
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225U
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Productivity