PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+27.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 112.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225T.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 5 225T

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,943 vs 11,408).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 112.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Core Ultra 5 225T

2025

Why buy it

✅+27.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 112.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225T.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 8 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,943 vs 11,408).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 112.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than Core i5-13400F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 5 225T is ahead with a 15.3% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 27.6% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 27.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 225T is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 5 225T is 22.4% more expensive on MSRP at $240 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.3% average FPS lead across 8 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i5-13400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 27.6% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i5-13400F is also 14.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 112.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-13400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 5 225T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225T
1080p
low	171 FPS	253 FPS
medium	158 FPS	244 FPS
high	132 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	175 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	217 FPS
medium	123 FPS	186 FPS
high	99 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	132 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	148 FPS
medium	74 FPS	126 FPS
high	59 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 225T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225T
1080p
low	545 FPS	595 FPS
medium	464 FPS	508 FPS
high	389 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	377 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	498 FPS
medium	403 FPS	438 FPS
high	345 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	317 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	299 FPS
medium	247 FPS	264 FPS
high	231 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	217 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 225T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225T
1080p
low	530 FPS	672 FPS
medium	449 FPS	672 FPS
high	415 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	522 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	672 FPS
medium	422 FPS	588 FPS
high	382 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	439 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	504 FPS
medium	331 FPS	422 FPS
high	296 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	318 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 225T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225T
1080p
low	626 FPS	672 FPS
medium	626 FPS	672 FPS
high	626 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	672 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	672 FPS
medium	626 FPS	672 FPS
high	598 FPS	611 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	550 FPS
medium	492 FPS	501 FPS
high	439 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	393 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Core Ultra 5 225T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core Ultra 5 225T

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core Ultra 5 225T

The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 225T's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 5 225T's 26,874 — a 7.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,677, a 10.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 8,943 (24.2% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225T
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	10 / 10
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+140%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	25,029	26,874+7%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	2,677+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+28%	8,943

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225T) — the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225T).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Core Ultra 5 225T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Arc Graphics (16EU)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 225T debuted at $240. On MSRP ($196 vs $240), the Core i5-13400F is $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 112.0 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225T — making the Core i5-13400F the 13.1% better value option.