
Core Ultra 5 225H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.6% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 130T GPU, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 14,526).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.6% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 130T GPU, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 14,526).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225H better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 685 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 653 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and Ryzen 5 3600

Core Ultra 5 225H
Core Ultra 5 225H
The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 47.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,526 vs 9,500 (41.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 1,295, a 69.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 1,898 (146.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+17% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+19% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 32 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 28,802+63% | 17,685 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,526+53% | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,678+107% | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,337+550% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Core Ultra 5 225H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Core Ultra 5 225H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 130T GPU), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 130T GPU | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation Laptop | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












