
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 225H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+11.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 130T GPU, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 16,211).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+11.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225H.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 130T GPU, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 16,211).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225H better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 685 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 327 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 233 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 720 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 383 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 720 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 720 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core Ultra 5 225H

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core Ultra 5 225H
Core Ultra 5 225H
The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core Ultra 5 225H's 28,802 — a 14% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 14,526 (11% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,678, a 10.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 12,337 (7.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 14+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+72% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+11% | 18 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Arrow Lake-H (2025) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 28,802+15% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211+12% | 14,526 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | 2,678+11% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | 12,337+8% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 225H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 225H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 130T GPU), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Arc 130T GPU |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Professional Content Creation Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













