Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370

AMD

Radeon Pro 465

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 370

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4538

G3D Mark Score

4722

Performance Difference

Radeon R9 370 is 4.1% faster than Radeon Pro 465

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon Pro 465N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Radeon R9 3704096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,722 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R9 370 performs 4.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon Pro 465 and Radeon R9 370.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon Pro 465 and Radeon R9 370

AMD

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:64
Vram:null
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:850 MHz
Boost Clock:907 MHz
Shading Units:1024
Transistor Count:3,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:58.05
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):35 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.858 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Baffin
Architecture:GCN 4.0 (2016βˆ’2020)
Release Date:October 30 2016
Performance Ranking Position:547
AMD

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:384 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:925 MHz
Boost Clock:975 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:78.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):110 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.496 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Trinidad
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Release Date:May 5 2015
Performance Ranking Position:456

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 465 and Radeon R9 370