Quadro P3200 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

8578

G3D Mark Score

12747

Performance Difference

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 48.6% faster than Quadro P3200

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro P3200N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti6144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
45%
low83%
medium76%
high43%
ultra21%
1440pLow
29%
low76%
medium43%
high21%
ultra15%
4KLow
12%
low43%
medium21%
high5%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 12,747 G3D Mark (mid-range)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT limited to 1080p with DLSS Performance mode.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti performs 48.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro P3200 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro P3200 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200

The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:112
Vram:null
L1 Cache:672 kB
L2 Cache:1536 kB
Core Clock:1328 MHz
Boost Clock:1543 MHz
Shading Units:1792
Transistor Count:7,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:172.8
Manufacturing Process:16 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.53 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GP104
Architecture:Pascal (2016βˆ’2021)
Release Date:February 21 2018
Performance Ranking Position:304
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:96
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:1.5 MB
L2 Cache:1536 kB
Core Clock:1500 MHz
Boost Clock:1770 MHz
Shading Units:1536
Transistor Count:6,600 million
Texture Fill Rate:169.9
Manufacturing Process:12 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):120 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.437 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:TU116
Architecture:Turing (2018βˆ’2022)
Launch Price:$279
Release Date:February 22 2019
Performance Ranking Position:204

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P3200 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti