Quadro P2000 vs Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 285

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

6964

G3D Mark Score

6680

Performance Difference

Quadro P2000 is 4.3% faster than Radeon R9 285

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro P20005120 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
25%
low75%
medium49%
high20%
ultra4%
1440pLow
12%
low49%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

5 GB VRAM Β· 6,964 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon R9 285N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro P2000 performs 4.3% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro P2000 and Radeon R9 285.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro P2000 and Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:40
TMUs:64
Vram:5120 MB
L1 Cache:384 kB
L2 Cache:1280 kB
Core Clock:1076 MHz
Boost Clock:1480 MHz
Shading Units:1024
Transistor Count:4,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:94.72
Manufacturing Process:16 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.031 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GP106
Architecture:Pascal (2016βˆ’2021)
Launch Price:$585
Release Date:February 6 2017
Performance Ranking Position:346
AMD

Radeon R9 285

The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. Core clock: 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:112
Vram:null
L1 Cache:448 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:918 MHz
Shading Units:1792
Transistor Count:5,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:102.8
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):190 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.29 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Tonga
Architecture:GCN 3.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Launch Price:$249
Release Date:September 2 2014
Performance Ranking Position:365

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 and Radeon R9 285