FirePro W9000 vs Radeon R9 280X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

6157

G3D Mark Score

6100

Performance Difference

FirePro W9000 is 0.9% faster than Radeon R9 280X

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro W90006144 MB

016GB32GB

1080pMedium

30%

low82%

medium60%

high20%

ultra10%

1440pLow

15%

low60%

medium20%

high10%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low20%

medium10%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM · 6,157 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.

1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon R9 280X3072 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLow

19%

low57%

medium37%

high14%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low37%

medium14%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low14%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

3 GB VRAM · 6,100 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, FirePro W9000 performs 0.9% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro W9000 and Radeon R9 280X.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro W9000 and Radeon R9 280X

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32

TMUs:128

Vram:6144 MB

L1 Cache:512 kB

L2 Cache:768 kB

Core Clock:975 MHz

Shading Units:2048

Transistor Count:4,313 million

Texture Fill Rate:124.8

Manufacturing Process:28 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):350 Watt

Floating Point Performance:3.994 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Tahiti

Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)

Launch Price:$3,999

Release Date:June 14 2012

Performance Ranking Position:390

Radeon R9 280X

The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Boost clock: 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.