FirePro W9000 vs Radeon RX 6300M

FirePro W9000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

6157

G3D Mark Score

6421

Performance Difference

Radeon RX 6300M is 4.3% faster than FirePro W9000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro W90006144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
30%
low82%
medium60%
high20%
ultra10%
1440pLow
15%
low60%
medium20%
high10%
ultra4%
4KLimited
7%
low20%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 6,157 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon RX 6300MN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon RX 6300M performs 4.3% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro W9000 and Radeon RX 6300M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro W9000 and Radeon RX 6300M

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:512 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Core Clock:975 MHz
Shading Units:2048
Transistor Count:4,313 million
Texture Fill Rate:124.8
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):350 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.994 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Tahiti
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$3,999
Release Date:June 14 2012
Performance Ranking Position:390
AMD

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It includes 12 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:48
Vram:null
L0 Cache:192 kB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
L3 Cache:8 MB
Core Clock:2000 MHz
Boost Clock:2400 MHz
Shading Units:768
Transistor Count:5,400 million
Ray Tracing Cores:12
Texture Fill Rate:115.2
Manufacturing Process:6 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):35 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.686 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 24
Architecture:RDNA 2.0 (2020βˆ’2025)
Release Date:January 4 2022
Performance Ranking Position:379

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W9000 and Radeon RX 6300M