
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4410T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,245).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4410T, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4410T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+21.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+21.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 26 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+21.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,245).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4410T, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4410T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (26 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Silver 4410T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 307 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 333 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Silver 4410T


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Silver 4410T
Xeon Silver 4410T
The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4410T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 19.4% lead for the Xeon Silver 4410T. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+22% | 26.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 27,245+21% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











