
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1290P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290P, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon W-1290P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W-1290P
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,373 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon W-1290P
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290P, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon W-1290P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,373 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-1290P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 241 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 300 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 544 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-1290P


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-1290P
Xeon W-1290P
The Xeon W-1290P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,373 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1290P offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1290P — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-1290P uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-1290P's 22,373 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+60% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 22,373 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1290P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











