
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6146
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 22,595).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6146, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6146 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6146
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 6146
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 22,595).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6146, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6146 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 6146?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6146 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6146 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 190 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6146 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 565 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6146 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 565 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6146


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6146
Xeon Gold 6146
The Xeon Gold 6146 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 22,595 points. Launch price was $3,286.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6146 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6146 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6146 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6146 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6146's 22,595 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6146. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6146.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6146 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+5% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+29% | 24.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 12 MB+2300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 22,595 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6146 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6146 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











