
Xeon Gold 6238
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4314
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6238
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+26% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4314 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon Silver 4314
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 140W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,095 vs 29,118).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6238 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6238
2019Xeon Silver 4314
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+26% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 140W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4314 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,095 vs 29,118).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6238 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4314 better than Xeon Gold 6238?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6238 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6238 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 127 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6238 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 700 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 456 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6238 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 728 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 728 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 610 FPS | 568 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 728 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 323 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6238 and Xeon Silver 4314

Xeon Gold 6238
Xeon Gold 6238
The Xeon Gold 6238 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,118 points. Launch price was $2,612.

Xeon Silver 4314
Xeon Silver 4314
The Xeon Silver 4314 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 29,095 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6238 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6238 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4314 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6238 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6238 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6238 scores 29,118 against the Xeon Silver 4314's 29,095 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6238. L3 cache: 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4314.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6238 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 22 / 44+38% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 30.25 MB+26% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 22 MB+2100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 29,118 | 29,095 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6238 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6238 versus 2667 on the Xeon Silver 4314 — the Xeon Gold 6238 supports 9.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4314 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1024 — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6238) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4314). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6238) vs 64 (Xeon Silver 4314) — the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6238) and C621A (Xeon Silver 4314).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6238 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933+10% | 2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | 6144+500% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6238 rivals EPYC 7402; Xeon Silver 4314 rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6238 | Xeon Silver 4314 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












