Xeon Gold 6238 vs Xeon Silver 4314

Intel

Xeon Gold 6238

22 Cores44 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4314

16 Cores32 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 6238

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • +26% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4314 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Silver 4314

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 135W instead of 140W, a 5W reduction.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (29,095 vs 29,118).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6238 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4314 better than Xeon Gold 6238?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4314 is ahead with a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6238 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6238 also has the bigger cache pool with 26% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6238 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 26% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Silver 4314 is the smarter buy today. Xeon Silver 4314 is at an unclear MSRP at $395 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Gold 6238 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (73.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Silver 4314 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon Gold 6238Xeon Silver 4314
1080p
low187 FPS172 FPS
medium152 FPS138 FPS
high124 FPS112 FPS
ultra96 FPS87 FPS
1440p
low146 FPS141 FPS
medium115 FPS111 FPS
high92 FPS88 FPS
ultra72 FPS69 FPS
4K
low68 FPS67 FPS
medium57 FPS56 FPS
high45 FPS44 FPS
ultra36 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon Gold 6238Xeon Silver 4314
1080p
low214 FPS370 FPS
medium189 FPS321 FPS
high162 FPS268 FPS
ultra137 FPS218 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS318 FPS
medium168 FPS285 FPS
high144 FPS243 FPS
ultra121 FPS194 FPS
4K
low121 FPS205 FPS
medium110 FPS186 FPS
high100 FPS159 FPS
ultra83 FPS127 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon Gold 6238Xeon Silver 4314
1080p
low700 FPS727 FPS
medium563 FPS727 FPS
high510 FPS727 FPS
ultra440 FPS672 FPS
1440p
low560 FPS727 FPS
medium456 FPS633 FPS
high413 FPS595 FPS
ultra356 FPS526 FPS
4K
low407 FPS475 FPS
medium317 FPS372 FPS
high282 FPS329 FPS
ultra226 FPS267 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon Gold 6238Xeon Silver 4314
1080p
low728 FPS727 FPS
medium728 FPS727 FPS
high699 FPS661 FPS
ultra610 FPS568 FPS
1440p
low728 FPS672 FPS
medium639 FPS587 FPS
high550 FPS506 FPS
ultra468 FPS434 FPS
4K
low501 FPS462 FPS
medium449 FPS415 FPS
high400 FPS370 FPS
ultra345 FPS323 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6238 and Xeon Silver 4314

Intel

Xeon Gold 6238

The Xeon Gold 6238 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,118 points. Launch price was $2,612.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4314

The Xeon Silver 4314 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 29,095 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6238 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6238 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4314 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6238 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6238 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6238 scores 29,118 against the Xeon Silver 4314's 29,095 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6238. L3 cache: 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4314.

FeatureXeon Gold 6238Xeon Silver 4314
Cores / Threads
22 / 44+38%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+9%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
30.25 MB+26%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
22 MB+2100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
29,118
29,095
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6238 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4314 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6238 versus 2667 on the Xeon Silver 4314 — the Xeon Gold 6238 supports 9.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4314 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1024 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6238) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4314). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6238) vs 64 (Xeon Silver 4314) — the Xeon Silver 4314 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6238) and C621A (Xeon Silver 4314).

FeatureXeon Gold 6238Xeon Silver 4314
Socket
LGA3647
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
2933+10%
2667
Max RAM Capacity
1024
6144+500%
RAM Channels
6
8+33%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
64+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6238 rivals EPYC 7402; Xeon Silver 4314 rivals EPYC 7313.

FeatureXeon Gold 6238Xeon Silver 4314
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d