PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 7940H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6238 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6238, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6238

2019

Why buy it

✅+89.1% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (29,118 vs 29,151).
❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940H moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 7940H

2023

Xeon Gold 6238

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6238 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+89.1% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6238, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (29,118 vs 29,151).
❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940H moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7940H better than Xeon Gold 6238?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6238 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7940H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7940H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 46.9% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7940H is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7940H still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 9 7940H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 46.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7940H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 22/44. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 7940H Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6238 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7940H	Xeon Gold 6238
1080p
low	268 FPS	187 FPS
medium	241 FPS	152 FPS
high	206 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	234 FPS	146 FPS
medium	191 FPS	115 FPS
high	158 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	160 FPS	68 FPS
medium	132 FPS	57 FPS
high	102 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7940H Open Xeon Gold 6238

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7940H	Xeon Gold 6238
1080p
low	502 FPS	214 FPS
medium	417 FPS	189 FPS
high	360 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	137 FPS
1440p
low	439 FPS	185 FPS
medium	385 FPS	168 FPS
high	332 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	282 FPS	121 FPS
4K
low	291 FPS	121 FPS
medium	267 FPS	110 FPS
high	251 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	83 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7940H Open Xeon Gold 6238

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 7940H	Xeon Gold 6238
1080p
low	729 FPS	700 FPS
medium	729 FPS	563 FPS
high	729 FPS	510 FPS
ultra	650 FPS	440 FPS
1440p
low	729 FPS	560 FPS
medium	637 FPS	456 FPS
high	548 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	356 FPS
4K
low	534 FPS	407 FPS
medium	460 FPS	317 FPS
high	409 FPS	282 FPS
ultra	344 FPS	226 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7940H Open Xeon Gold 6238

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 7940H	Xeon Gold 6238
1080p
low	729 FPS	728 FPS
medium	729 FPS	728 FPS
high	729 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	729 FPS	610 FPS
1440p
low	729 FPS	728 FPS
medium	729 FPS	639 FPS
high	716 FPS	550 FPS
ultra	631 FPS	468 FPS
4K
low	619 FPS	501 FPS
medium	553 FPS	449 FPS
high	496 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	345 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7940H Open Xeon Gold 6238

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7940H and Xeon Gold 6238

Ryzen 9 7940H

The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6238

The Xeon Gold 6238 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,118 points. Launch price was $2,612.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7940H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6238 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon Gold 6238 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238 — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H (base: 4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940H uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6238 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940H scores 29,151 against the Xeon Gold 6238's 29,118 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H vs 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940H	Xeon Gold 6238
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	22 / 44+175%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+41%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+90%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30.25 MB+89%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	22 MB+2100%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	29,151	29,118
Cinebench R23 Multi	17,200	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,646	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,495	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940H uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6238 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940H versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6238 — the Xeon Gold 6238 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6238 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940H) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6238). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 7940H) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6238) — the Xeon Gold 6238 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6238).

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940H	Xeon Gold 6238
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	2933+58560%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+26214300%	1024
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7940H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6238). The Ryzen 9 7940H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6238 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H; Xeon Gold 6238 rivals EPYC 7402.