
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6238
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $899 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6238 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6238
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,118 vs 29,462).
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018Xeon Gold 6238
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $899 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6238 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,118 vs 29,462).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2950X better than Xeon Gold 6238?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 532 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 267 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 737 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 630 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 584 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 509 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 737 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 737 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 714 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 636 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 737 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 667 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 500 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and Xeon Gold 6238


Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

Xeon Gold 6238
Xeon Gold 6238
The Xeon Gold 6238 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,118 points. Launch price was $2,612.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6238 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon Gold 6238 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6238 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X scores 29,462 against the Xeon Gold 6238's 29,118 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 22 / 44+38% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+6% | 30.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 22 MB+4300% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | ZEN+ (2018−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 29,462+1% | 29,118 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,444 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,255 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,814 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6238 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6238 — the Xeon Gold 6238 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6238 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6238). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6238) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6238).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | 2933+73225% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+26214300% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+33% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6238 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6238). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6238 rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











