
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4116
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +75.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,918 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +75.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,918 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Silver 4116?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 266 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Silver 4116


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 40.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+94% | 16.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 22,430+50% | 14,918 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











