PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,111 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 109.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (83,235 vs 84,013).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8592+

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Xeon Platinum 8592+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,111 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 109.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (83,235 vs 84,013).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 320 MB).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX better than Xeon Platinum 8592+?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is ahead with a 11.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8592+ pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8592+ also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is $6,111 cheaper on MSRP at $5,489 MSRP versus $11,600 MSRP, and it gives you a 11.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8592+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 109.4% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 7.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8592+ is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, 25% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 256 MB), more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8592+ Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	173 FPS	188 FPS
medium	142 FPS	165 FPS
high	121 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	152 FPS	155 FPS
medium	122 FPS	131 FPS
high	97 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	70 FPS
medium	61 FPS	63 FPS
high	48 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	40 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	571 FPS	277 FPS
medium	495 FPS	246 FPS
high	380 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	325 FPS	167 FPS
1440p
low	480 FPS	230 FPS
medium	423 FPS	208 FPS
high	336 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	301 FPS	143 FPS
medium	269 FPS	131 FPS
high	230 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	99 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	660 FPS	849 FPS
medium	546 FPS	768 FPS
high	481 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	412 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	555 FPS	737 FPS
medium	465 FPS	662 FPS
high	412 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	354 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	406 FPS	493 FPS
medium	323 FPS	402 FPS
high	285 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	303 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Platinum 8592+
1080p
low	909 FPS	938 FPS
medium	818 FPS	849 FPS
high	695 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	604 FPS	633 FPS
1440p
low	739 FPS	776 FPS
medium	643 FPS	677 FPS
high	545 FPS	581 FPS
ultra	463 FPS	497 FPS
4K
low	514 FPS	559 FPS
medium	461 FPS	501 FPS
high	407 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	346 FPS	383 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Open Xeon Platinum 8592+

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and Xeon Platinum 8592+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

Xeon Platinum 8592+

The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and Xeon Platinum 8592+ share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX scores 83,235 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8592+. L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+8%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+42%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB	320 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	83,235	84,013
Cinebench R23 Multi	64,355	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,266	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	20,256	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Socket	sWRX8	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	5600+139900%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB+52428700%	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX	Xeon Platinum 8592+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX launched at $5489 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ debuted at $11600. On MSRP ($5489 vs $11600), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is $6111 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX the 70.7% better value option.