
EPYC 7763
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7763
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7763 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (83,235 vs 84,440).
EPYC 7763
2021Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7763 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (83,235 vs 84,440).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7763 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7763 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7763 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 418 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 325 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7763 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 836 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 649 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7763 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 975 FPS | 909 FPS |
| medium | 885 FPS | 818 FPS |
| high | 761 FPS | 695 FPS |
| ultra | 655 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 739 FPS |
| medium | 648 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 554 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 476 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763
The EPYC 7763 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 84,440 points. Launch price was $7,890.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7763 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7763 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7763 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7763 scores 84,440 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX's 83,235 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 7763. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7763 vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz | 2.7 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 84,440+1% | 83,235 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 64,355 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,266 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,256 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7763 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7763 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — the EPYC 7763 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7763 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7763) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+79900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 2048 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7763) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7763 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7763 launched at $7890 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX debuted at $5489. On MSRP ($7890 vs $5489), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is $2401 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7763 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX the 34.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7763 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7890 | $5489-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7 | 15.2+42% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












