PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7J13

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7J13 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (83,235 vs 84,786).

EPYC 7J13

2021

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $7,890 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($7,890 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7J13 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (83,235 vs 84,786).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7J13 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?

Yes. EPYC 7J13 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7J13 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7J13 is the better fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7J13 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 7J13 is 43.7% more expensive on MSRP at $7,890 MSRP versus $5,489 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is also 41.1% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 10.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7J13 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7J13 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7J13	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
1080p
low	190 FPS	173 FPS
medium	155 FPS	142 FPS
high	123 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	152 FPS
medium	123 FPS	122 FPS
high	94 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	71 FPS
medium	60 FPS	61 FPS
high	46 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 7J13 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7J13	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
1080p
low	422 FPS	571 FPS
medium	371 FPS	495 FPS
high	301 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	325 FPS
1440p
low	347 FPS	480 FPS
medium	313 FPS	423 FPS
high	261 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	213 FPS	301 FPS
medium	196 FPS	269 FPS
high	164 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	201 FPS

Open EPYC 7J13 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7J13	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
1080p
low	836 FPS	660 FPS
medium	696 FPS	546 FPS
high	649 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	412 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	555 FPS
medium	500 FPS	465 FPS
high	458 FPS	412 FPS
ultra	400 FPS	354 FPS
4K
low	430 FPS	406 FPS
medium	335 FPS	323 FPS
high	300 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	227 FPS

Open EPYC 7J13 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7J13	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
1080p
low	977 FPS	909 FPS
medium	886 FPS	818 FPS
high	762 FPS	695 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	604 FPS
1440p
low	746 FPS	739 FPS
medium	649 FPS	643 FPS
high	555 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	477 FPS	463 FPS
4K
low	532 FPS	514 FPS
medium	473 FPS	461 FPS
high	415 FPS	407 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	346 FPS

Open EPYC 7J13 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7J13 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

EPYC 7J13

The EPYC 7J13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 84,786 points. Launch price was $6,000.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7J13 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7J13 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7J13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7J13 scores 84,786 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX's 83,235 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 7J13. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7J13 vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

Feature	EPYC 7J13	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.2 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.55 GHz	2.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	84,786+2%	83,235
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	64,355
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,266
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	20,256

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7J13 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7J13 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — the EPYC 7J13 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7J13 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7J13) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX).

Feature	EPYC 7J13	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Socket	SP3	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+79900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	2048 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7J13) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7J13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.

Feature	EPYC 7J13	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	true

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7J13 launched at $7890 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX debuted at $5489. On MSRP ($7890 vs $5489), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is $2401 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7J13 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX the 34.1% better value option.