PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7J13

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $910 less on MSRP ($7,890 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (84,786 vs 91,340).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).

EPYC 7773X

2022

Why buy it

✅+7.7% higher PassMark.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7J13 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
11.5% HIGHER MSRP
$8,800 MSRPvs$7,890 MSRP

EPYC 7J13

2021

EPYC 7773X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $910 less on MSRP ($7,890 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+7.7% higher PassMark.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (84,786 vs 91,340).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7J13 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
11.5% HIGHER MSRP
$8,800 MSRPvs$7,890 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7773X better than EPYC 7J13?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, EPYC 7J13 is ahead with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7773X pulls ahead with 7.7% better PassMark. EPYC 7773X also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7773X is the better fit. You are getting 7.7% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7773X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7J13 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 7773X is 11.5% more expensive on MSRP at $8,800 MSRP versus $7,890 MSRP, and it gives you 7.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that EPYC 7J13 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7J13 is also 3.5% better value on MSRP (10.7 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7773X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), 200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 64/128. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7J13 Benchmark Check

EPYC 7773X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7J13	EPYC 7773X
1080p
low	190 FPS	197 FPS
medium	155 FPS	160 FPS
high	123 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	158 FPS
medium	123 FPS	124 FPS
high	94 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	73 FPS
medium	60 FPS	61 FPS
high	46 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 7J13 Open EPYC 7773X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7J13	EPYC 7773X
1080p
low	422 FPS	257 FPS
medium	371 FPS	228 FPS
high	301 FPS	189 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	150 FPS
1440p
low	347 FPS	211 FPS
medium	313 FPS	192 FPS
high	261 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	126 FPS
4K
low	213 FPS	131 FPS
medium	196 FPS	121 FPS
high	164 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	86 FPS

Open EPYC 7J13 Open EPYC 7773X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7J13	EPYC 7773X
1080p
low	836 FPS	850 FPS
medium	696 FPS	708 FPS
high	649 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	582 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	612 FPS
medium	500 FPS	508 FPS
high	458 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	400 FPS	407 FPS
4K
low	430 FPS	437 FPS
medium	335 FPS	341 FPS
high	300 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	246 FPS

Open EPYC 7J13 Open EPYC 7773X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7J13	EPYC 7773X
1080p
low	977 FPS	955 FPS
medium	886 FPS	867 FPS
high	762 FPS	742 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	639 FPS
1440p
low	746 FPS	738 FPS
medium	649 FPS	642 FPS
high	555 FPS	547 FPS
ultra	477 FPS	470 FPS
4K
low	532 FPS	525 FPS
medium	473 FPS	468 FPS
high	415 FPS	409 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	356 FPS

Open EPYC 7J13 Open EPYC 7773X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7J13 and EPYC 7773X

EPYC 7J13

The EPYC 7J13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 84,786 points. Launch price was $6,000.

EPYC 7773X

The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7J13 and EPYC 7773X share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7J13 versus 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.55 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7J13 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 7773X uses Milan-X (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7J13 scores 84,786 against the EPYC 7773X's 91,340 — a 7.4% lead for the EPYC 7773X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7J13 vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X.

Feature	EPYC 7J13	EPYC 7773X
Cores / Threads	64 / 128	64 / 128
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.55 GHz+16%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	768 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Milan-X (2022)
PassMark	84,786	91,340+8%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,536
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	45,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7J13 versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X — the EPYC 7J13 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7J13 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7J13) and SP3 (EPYC 7773X).

Feature	EPYC 7J13	EPYC 7773X
Socket	SP3	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+79900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4 TB+104857500%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7J13) vs AMD-V (EPYC 7773X). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7J13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654.

Feature	EPYC 7J13	EPYC 7773X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7J13 launched at $7890 MSRP, while the EPYC 7773X debuted at $8800. On MSRP ($7890 vs $8800), the EPYC 7J13 is $910 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7J13 delivers 10.7 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7773X — making the EPYC 7J13 the 3.5% better value option.