
Xeon Platinum 8570
Popular choices:

Xeon w9-3595X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 113 MB).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 385W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (65,000 vs 130,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
Xeon w9-3595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,706 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 300 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Xeon w9-3595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 113 MB).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 385W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,706 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 69.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (65,000 vs 130,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 300 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than Xeon Platinum 8570?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8570 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8570 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 133 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8570 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 910 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 838 FPS | 1086 FPS |
| high | 791 FPS | 1020 FPS |
| ultra | 698 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 782 FPS | 1009 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 913 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 840 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 400 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8570 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 969 FPS | 1145 FPS |
| medium | 875 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 754 FPS | 901 FPS |
| ultra | 654 FPS | 802 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 792 FPS | 928 FPS |
| medium | 691 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 593 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 629 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 454 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8570 and Xeon w9-3595X

Xeon Platinum 8570
Xeon Platinum 8570
The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.

Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8570 packs 56 cores / 112 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8570 uses the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8570 scores 93,722 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 4% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 65,000 vs 130,000 (66.7% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 2,300, a 16% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,960 vs 17,118 (10.2% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570). L3 cache: 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570 vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8570 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 56 / 112 | 60 / 120+7% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+5% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 300 MB (total)+167% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Emerald Rapids (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 93,722 | 97,534+4% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 65,000 | 130,000+100% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | 2,300+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,960+11% | 17,118 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4677 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the Xeon w9-3595X offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8570 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 112+40% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8570 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Server | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8570 launched at $9595 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3595X debuted at $5889. On MSRP ($9595 vs $5889), the Xeon w9-3595X is $3706 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8570 delivers 9.8 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Xeon w9-3595X the 51.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8570 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9595 | $5889-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.8 | 16.6+69% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













