
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,296 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 648.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8570 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 93,722).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8570, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8570 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,296 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 648.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8570 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 93,722).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8570, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8570 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8570 better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 838 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 791 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 782 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 330 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 969 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 875 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 754 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 654 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 792 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Xeon Platinum 8570


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Platinum 8570
Xeon Platinum 8570
The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 50 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 14% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 124.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 56 / 112+833% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 300 MB (total)+838% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 93,722+329% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 65,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,960 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — the Xeon Platinum 8570 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8570). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4 TB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8570 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 debuted at $9595. On MSRP ($299 vs $9595), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $9296 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 152.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-97% | $9595 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+646% | 9.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












