PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $9,266 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1071.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 350W, a 225W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon Platinum 8570 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 93,722).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8570, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅+148.9% higher PassMark.
✅+1150% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 350W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $9,266 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1071.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 350W, a 225W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon Platinum 8570 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+148.9% higher PassMark.
✅+1150% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 93,722).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 300 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8570, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 350W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Xeon Platinum 8570?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8570 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8570 is the better fit. You are getting 148.9% better PassMark, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1150% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is $9,266 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $9,595 MSRP, and it gives you a 13.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8570 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 148.9% better PassMark. It is also 1071.7% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 9.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8570 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 1150% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 24 MB), more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 14/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8570 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	281 FPS	188 FPS
medium	264 FPS	165 FPS
high	220 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	155 FPS
medium	198 FPS	131 FPS
high	158 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	70 FPS
medium	133 FPS	63 FPS
high	102 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	632 FPS	282 FPS
medium	533 FPS	250 FPS
high	450 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	230 FPS
medium	474 FPS	208 FPS
high	403 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	143 FPS
medium	282 FPS	131 FPS
high	269 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	99 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	663 FPS	910 FPS
medium	543 FPS	838 FPS
high	477 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	782 FPS
medium	499 FPS	716 FPS
high	434 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	528 FPS
medium	381 FPS	444 FPS
high	344 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	330 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon Platinum 8570

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	941 FPS	971 FPS
medium	941 FPS	875 FPS
high	923 FPS	754 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	654 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	793 FPS
medium	850 FPS	691 FPS
high	738 FPS	593 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	572 FPS
medium	588 FPS	514 FPS
high	529 FPS	454 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	391 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Xeon Platinum 8570

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Xeon Platinum 8570

The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 85.4% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Platinum 8570
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	56 / 112+300%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+27%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+67%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB	300 MB (total)+1150%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	37,655	93,722+149%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	65,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,960

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8570). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Platinum 8570
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4 TB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	80+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8570 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Xeon Platinum 8570
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 debuted at $9595. On MSRP ($329 vs $9595), the Core i5-13600K is $9266 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the Core i5-13600K the 168.5% better value option.