
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

M4 Pro (14 cores)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (37,655 vs 38,127).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M4 Pro (14 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β3025% higher power demand at 125W vs 4W.
M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024Why buy it
- β +1.3% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 4W instead of 125W, a 121W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-13600K
2022M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- β +1.3% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 4W instead of 125W, a 121W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (37,655 vs 38,127).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M4 Pro (14 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β3025% higher power demand at 125W vs 4W.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is M4 Pro (14 cores) better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 194 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 509 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 254 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 953 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 924 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 809 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 718 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 817 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 718 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 399 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and M4 Pro (14 cores)

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
M4 Pro (14 cores)
M4 Pro (14 cores)
The M4 Pro (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,127 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, matching the M4 Pro (14 cores)'s 14 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.5 GHz on the M4 Pro (14 cores) β a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.59 GHz). The Core i5-13600K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the M4 Pro (14 cores)'s 38,127 β a 1.2% lead for the M4 Pro (14 cores).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+13% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.59 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | β |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | β |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 37,655 | 38,127+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M4 Pro (14 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus 8533 on the M4 Pro (14 cores) β the M4 Pro (14 cores) supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) β the Core i5-13600K offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Apple M4 (M4 Pro (14 cores)).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 8533+170560% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+314572700% | 64 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 0 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Pro (14 cores)). Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core) (M4 Pro (14 cores)) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (14 cores) rivals Core Ultra 7 258V.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













